Anthropic and London: AI Ethics Redefines Alliances
Le brief IA que les pros lisent chaque soir
Les 7 actus IA du jour, décryptées en 5 min. Gratuit.
Inclus dès l'inscription : notre sélection des meilleurs guides & comparatifs IA.
Choisis ton rythme
Gratuit · Pas de spam · Désabonnement en 1 clic
A Refusal with International Repercussions
Anthropic's expansion in the UK comes amid tensions with the US government. In February, US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth issued an ultimatum to Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic. He asked him to lift the safeguards on their AI, Claude, to allow its use in autonomous weapons and domestic mass surveillance. Amodei categorically refused, stating that such use could contradict the democratic values the company strives to uphold.
In response to this refusal, President Trump ordered every federal agency to immediately cease using Anthropic's technology. Furthermore, the Pentagon classified the company as a supply chain risk, a label typically reserved for foreign companies perceived as hostile, such as Huawei. This decision led to the cancellation of a $200 million contract the Pentagon had with Anthropic. Defense technology companies have also instructed their employees to stop using Claude and to turn to alternatives.
London Sees an Opportunity
In light of this situation, the UK has perceived a unique opportunity. The UK Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT) has developed proposals for Anthropic, a company valued at $380 billion. These proposals include a dual listing on the London Stock Exchange and the expansion of the company's offices in the British capital. The office of Prime Minister Keir Starmer supports this effort, which will be presented to Amodei during his planned visit at the end of May.
Anthropic already has a significant presence in the UK, with around 200 employees. The British government views Anthropic's ethical approach, which integrates ethical constraints into AI development, as a major asset rather than a hindrance. A dual listing in London would give Anthropic access to European institutional investors, which could be crucial as its regulatory position in the United States remains uncertain.
An Attractive Regulatory Framework
The decision by US Judge Rita Lin, who granted a preliminary injunction blocking the government's blacklist against Anthropic, highlights the tensions between US demands and the company's ethical values. She found the government's actions "concerning" and concluded that they likely violated the law. The Pentagon's appeal against this injunction is still ongoing in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, and the outcome remains uncertain.
Anthropic's lawyers argued in court documents that Claude was not developed to be used for lethal autonomous weapons without human oversight, nor deployed to spy on American citizens. The UK positions itself as a middle-ground regulatory environment, less restrictive than that of the US or the EU.
The UK is seeking to bolster its AI capabilities with a state-supported research lab worth £40 million. This strategy aims to compensate for the lack of local competitors to American AI giants.
Fierce Competition in London
The UK's desire to attract Anthropic is part of a broader competition. OpenAI has already chosen London for its largest research hub outside the US, and Google has established its presence at King's Cross since acquiring DeepMind.
Despite its legal challenges in the US, Anthropic continues to expand its international presence, with an office in Sydney, its fourth in the Asia-Pacific region. The question remains how much of this expansion London will be able to capture.
Anthropic, a company sidelined by Washington for its ethics, is now being courted by the UK, another G7 member that values those same principles. The discussions planned with Amodei at the end of May will be crucial for the company's future.
Brief IA — L'actualité IA en français
L'essentiel de l'actualité de l'intelligence artificielle, décrypté et expliqué chaque jour.