Meta Accused of Massive Hacking by Publishers and Authors
Le brief IA que les pros lisent chaque soir
Les 7 actus IA du jour, décryptées en 5 min. Gratuit.
Inclus dès l'inscription : notre sélection des meilleurs guides & comparatifs IA.
Choisis ton rythme
Gratuit · Pas de spam · Désabonnement en 1 clic
Meta Faces Copyright Violation Accusations
A group of academic and entertainment publishers has filed a lawsuit against Meta, claiming that the company has committed "one of the largest copyright violations in history." Among the plaintiffs are renowned publishers such as McGraw-Hill, Elsevier, Cengage, Hachette, and Macmillan. They accuse Meta of illegally acquiring or pirating copies of their protected materials — scientific journal articles, textbooks, and other books — to train its artificial intelligence models, including Llama.
The author, lawyer, and former president of the Authors Guild, Scott Turow, has joined this lawsuit. The complaint specifically targets Meta's CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, asserting that he "personally authorized and actively encouraged" the alleged illegal behavior. According to the plaintiffs, Meta's AI can quickly and on a large scale generate substitutes for the works it has been trained on, thereby threatening the authors' market.
Publishers' Reactions and Meta's Position
The American Association of Publishers responded by stating: "Meta has chosen to live by its motto 'move fast and break things,' and must now be held accountable for what it has broken, including copyright laws." A lawyer for the plaintiffs did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Meanwhile, a spokesperson for Meta told CNET that courts have rightly concluded that training AI on copyrighted material can be considered fair use, and that the company will vigorously fight this lawsuit.
Legal Context and Industry Stakes
Copyright is one of the most controversial legal issues surrounding AI. Tech companies like Meta need high-quality, human-created data to build and refine their AI models. Almost all of this material is protected by copyright, meaning that companies must enter into licensing agreements or defend their use of the content as fair use under copyright law.
Meta and Anthropic have both won previous cases in lawsuits brought by authors, successfully defending their fair use. Anthropic agreed to settle some piracy claims with authors for $1.5 billion, or about $3,000 per pirated work. Both judges warned in their rulings that this would not be the outcome in every case. U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria wrote in his 2025 ruling for Meta: "The market for romance or spy novels typically created by humans could be significantly diminished by the proliferation of similar works created by AI."
Potential Consequences for Authors
One of the biggest concerns in these cases is whether tech companies' use of copyrighted books will make it more difficult for human authors to sell their work or otherwise affect the market. The plaintiffs argue that Meta's AI models can produce fully AI-generated scientific articles and novels, pointing to a number of authors selling AI-written works on Amazon. This is particularly concerning for authors who claim that people are using AI to create content in their specific style.
"I find it troubling and exasperating that one of the ten largest companies in the world has knowingly used pirated copies of my books, and thousands of other authors', to train Llama, which can and has produced competing material, including works supposedly in my style," Turow told the New York Times.
Legal Precedents and Future Implications
Precedent — the history of previous court decisions — still plays a role in how current lawsuits unfold. However, it is still too early to say whether this case will proceed differently from previous cases in which judges have sided with tech companies.
Brief IA — L'actualité IA en français
L'essentiel de l'actualité de l'intelligence artificielle, décrypté et expliqué chaque jour.