Wikipedia and AI: A Strict Ban with Two Exceptions

⚡

Key Takeaways

1Wikipedia prohibits the use of AI to write or rewrite articles, except for proofreading and translation.

2The risks include content reliability, copyright violations, and algorithmic biases.

3The French version of Wikipedia allows limited uses of AI, such as paraphrasing and spell-checking.

💡Why it matters — This decision protects the credibility of Wikipedia as a collaborative and human source of information.

A Firm Ban on the Use of AI on Wikipedia

Wikipedia has taken a clear stance against the use of generative AI systems for writing or rewriting articles. This ban applies to the entire platform, with only two strictly regulated exceptions.

The Two Allowed Exceptions

Despite this general prohibition, Wikipedia permits the use of AI in two specific cases: proofreading one's own text and assisted translation. These uses must be subject to rigorous human oversight to ensure the quality and accuracy of the content.

The Reasons for the Ban

Several risks justify this ban. AI-generated content may lack reliability, particularly due to the absence of verifiable sources. Additionally, there is a risk of copyright infringement if protected texts are reproduced. Algorithmic biases represent another danger, compromising Wikipedia's encyclopedic neutrality.

Transparency and Perception

The use of AI could also harm the perception of Wikipedia as a human collaborative work, which is essential for maintaining user trust.

Specifics of the English Version

In the English version of Wikipedia, it has been decided that writing articles with large language models must be prohibited, whether for new texts or rewrites.

Specifics of the French Version

The French version of Wikipedia allows for some limited uses of AI, such as text rephrasing, checking the meaning of foreign words, summarizing sources, and correcting spelling, typographical, and syntactical errors.

Arguments Against the Use of AI

The Wikipedia community puts forward several arguments to justify this ban. AI-generated content can be novel and not in line with the encyclopedic spirit. It may also overlook relevant sources or use fictitious references, leading to misinformation. Algorithmic biases can compromise the neutrality and proportionality of articles. Finally, the use of AI could mislead readers, who expect human contributions.

The French-speaking Wikipedia community remains vigilant and strongly discourages the use of generative AI, except in the very specific cases allowed. These rules may evolve based on discussions and surveys within the community.