Brief IA

Grammarly Accused of Using Expert Names Without Consent

⚖️ Regulation & Ethics·Tom Levy·

Grammarly Accused of Using Expert Names Without Consent

Grammarly Accused of Using Expert Names Without Consent
Key Takeaways
1Grammarly uses the names of personalities like Stephen King for its AI feature without their prior consent.
2Grammarly's "Expert Review" feature offers writing advice inspired by experts, but without their direct involvement.
3Source links from the feature sometimes lead to spam sites or irrelevant content.
💡Why it mattersThis practice raises questions about the ethics of AI technologies and the protection of authors' rights.
Le brief IA que lisent les pros

Le brief IA que les pros lisent chaque soir

Les 7 actus IA du jour, décryptées en 5 min. Gratuit.

Inclus dès l'inscription : notre sélection des meilleurs guides & comparatifs IA.

Choisis ton rythme

Gratuit · Pas de spam · Désabonnement en 1 clic

📄
Full Analysis

Grammarly, known for its writing assistance tools, is at the center of a controversy regarding its AI feature "Expert Review." This feature, which offers writing advice, uses the names of well-known personalities such as Stephen King, Neil deGrasse Tyson, and even the late Carl Sagan, without their explicit consent.

Reports from The Verge, Platformer, and Wired reveal that Grammarly also includes technology journalists, such as Nilay Patel, editor-in-chief of The Verge, in its list of experts. None of these experts were consulted before their names were used.

Grammarly's "Expert Review" feature is designed to provide writing recommendations based on context. However, it has been criticized for misleading users by displaying these suggestions in Google Docs as comments from real users.

In response to the backlash, Grammarly has only offered an email opt-out option, without issuing an apology. Alex Gay, vice president of product marketing at Superhuman, the parent company, clarified that the feature does not claim direct involvement from the experts. Additionally, some source links for the feature lead to spam sites or irrelevant content, and the descriptions of the experts contain outdated job titles.

Brief IA — L'actualité IA en français

L'essentiel de l'actualité de l'intelligence artificielle, décrypté et expliqué chaque jour.