⚡
Brief IA
›

Sony and Warner Sue Anthropic for Training via Hacking

🤖 Models & LLM·Tom Levy·

Sony and Warner Sue Anthropic for Training via Hacking

Sony and Warner Sue Anthropic for Training via Hacking
⚡
Key Takeaways
1Sony Music Publishing, Warner Chappell, and other publishers are accusing Anthropic of using content obtained through piracy via torrents to train Claude.
2The complaint has been filed in the federal court for the Northern District of California and also targets Dario Amodei and Benjamin Mann.
3The plaintiffs cite the case Bartz v. Anthropic, which resulted in a $1.5 billion judgment and a ruling distinguishing between the use of works and acquisition through piracy.
💡Why it matters — this new action, presented as particularly broad by the plaintiffs, is part of a series of litigations regarding the training of AI with protected content.

Major publishers, including Sony Music Publishing and Warner Chappell, are suing Anthropic and its co-founders in California. They allege that Claude was trained using content acquired through illegal torrenting and reference a legal precedent involving $1.5 billion.

Plaintiffs allege use of torrents for millions of works

Sony Music Publishing, Warner Chappell, and other music publishers accuse Anthropic and its co-founders of using content obtained through piracy via peer-to-peer networks to train their AI model, Claude. According to the lawsuit, millions of copies of books, some containing lyrics and sheet music, were illegally downloaded. The publishers believe that thousands of copyrighted works were used in the training of the model. They describe this new action as particularly broad and claim to rely on legal precedents.

⚡Le brief IA que lisent les pros

Le brief IA que les pros lisent chaque soir

Les 7 actus IA du jour, décryptées en 5 min. Gratuit.

Inclus dès l'inscription : notre sélection des meilleurs guides & comparatifs IA.

Choisis ton rythme

Gratuit · Pas de spam · Désabonnement en 1 clic

Case filed in San Francisco and cited legal precedents

Last Friday, the lawsuit was filed in the federal court for the Northern District of California. The publishers indicate that some arguments made in this case had already been raised in other litigation, but that significant differences also exist. Among the cited precedents is the case of Bartz v. Anthropic, brought by some of the same lawyers, where Anthropic was accused of using copyrighted works to train products like Claude. In that case, a judge ruled that the use of copyrighted works was legal, but not their acquisition through piracy, and Anthropic was ordered to pay $1.5 billion. The lawyers involved also represent Concord Music Group and Universal Music Group in a separate action filed in January. The current lawsuit targets Anthropic as well as its co-founders Dario Amodei and Benjamin Mann. Anthropic could not be reached for comment before publication. The case was first reported by Music Business Worldwide.

⚡

Brief IA — L'actualité IA en français

L'essentiel de l'actualité de l'intelligence artificielle, décrypté et expliqué chaque jour.