Brief IA
›

Sony Music Publishing sues Anthropic for billions

Regulation & Ethics·Tom Levy·

Sony Music Publishing sues Anthropic for billions

Sony Music Publishing sues Anthropic for billions
Key Takeaways
1Sony Music Publishing and Warner Chappell are suing Anthropic and its co-founders in federal court in California
2The publishers are seeking up to $150,000 per work and $25,000 per copyright data removal, for potential damages in the billions
3The complaint details allegations of lyric extraction, mass downloads of books, and cites specific songs
4The case comes as Anthropic has already settled a lawsuit for $1.5 billion
Why it matters : This lawsuit is part of a series of major legal battles surrounding the use of protected works to train AI models.

Sony Music Publishing and Warner Chappell have filed a lawsuit against Anthropic in the federal court for the Northern District of California. The publishers are seeking up to $150,000 per work and up to $25,000 per copyright infringement, citing a potential total in the billions. The complaint also targets co-founders Dario Amodei and Benjamin Mann and outlines alleged methods of data acquisition. Anthropic recently settled another case for $1.5 billion.

Publishers Denounce Massive Appropriation and Cite Specific Titles

Sony Music Publishing and Warner Chappell describe the allegations against Anthropic as one of the largest intellectual property thefts in history. According to the complaint, these practices were used to develop, exploit, and generate significant profits from the Claude series of AI models. The publishers claim that Anthropic extracted lyrics from sites like MusixMatch and LyricFind, which pay for licenses from labels. Among the songs cited as being included in the training data are "Ain’t No Mountain High Enough," "Livin’ on a Prayer," "September," "Hallelujah," and "Paper Rings." Anthropic did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Le brief IA que lisent les pros

Le brief IA que les pros lisent chaque soir

Les 7 actus IA du jour, décryptées en 5 min. Gratuit.

Inclus dès l'inscription : notre sélection des meilleurs guides & comparatifs IA.

Choisissez votre rythme

Gratuit · Pas de spam · Désabonnement en 1 clic

Up to $150,000 per Work and $25,000 per Removal of Mentions

The publishers are demanding up to $150,000 per protected work and up to $25,000 for each identifiable copyright data removal, targeting "tens of thousands" of works. If the court grants the maximum amounts, damages could reach several billion dollars. The complaint also names Anthropic co-founders Dario Amodei and Benjamin Mann as individual defendants.

Alleged Book Downloads and Heavy Legal Context

The complaint alleges that Benjamin Mann downloaded over five million pirated books via BitTorrent, and that employees acquired at least two million additional works from Pirate Library Mirror. This lawsuit comes amid multiple litigations for Anthropic, which recently reached a $1.5 billion settlement with the publishing industry and is facing lawsuits from Universal Music Group, Concord, ABKCO, as well as separate actions from BMG and Round Hill Music. The complaint was filed in the federal court for the Northern District of California. A clarification from August 30 states that the complaint originates from Sony Music Publishing, which should not be confused with Sony Music Entertainment.

Brief IA — L'actualité IA en français

L'essentiel de l'actualité de l'intelligence artificielle, décrypté et expliqué chaque jour.