Brief IA

Grammarly Accused of Identity Theft: Julia Angwin Leads the Charge

⚖️ Regulation & Ethics·Tom Levy·

Grammarly Accused of Identity Theft: Julia Angwin Leads the Charge

Grammarly Accused of Identity Theft: Julia Angwin Leads the Charge
Key Takeaways
1Julia Angwin has filed a class action lawsuit against Grammarly for unauthorized use of her identity in an AI feature.
2Grammarly's "Expert Review" feature allegedly exploited the likeness of writers without their consent, according to an investigation by Wired.
3Grammarly has disabled the implicated feature and opened a mailbox for writers to request exclusion.
💡Why it mattersThis case raises crucial questions about the ethics of using identities in AI technologies, impacting user trust and the reputation of companies.
Le brief IA que lisent les pros

Le brief IA que les pros lisent chaque soir

Les 7 actus IA du jour, décryptées en 5 min. Gratuit.

Inclus dès l'inscription : notre sélection des meilleurs guides & comparatifs IA.

Choisis ton rythme

Gratuit · Pas de spam · Désabonnement en 1 clic

📄
Full Analysis

Journalist Julia Angwin has recently filed a class action lawsuit against the company Grammarly, alleging that her identity was used without permission in the company's AI editing feature "Expert Review." This lawsuit highlights controversial practices regarding the exploitation of writers' images and identities by Grammarly.

According to an investigation by Wired, Grammarly allegedly used the identities of several writers, including Angwin, without their prior consent. The complaint filed by Angwin accuses Grammarly of violating privacy and publicity rights by using the identities of "experts" for commercial purposes without their explicit agreement.

The discovery of Angwin's identity being used was facilitated by Casey Newton, another expert mentioned by The Verge during recent tests of the feature. Members of The Verge team, including editor-in-chief Nilay Patel, were also identified as being associated with the suggestions generated by Grammarly's AI.

In response to these allegations, Grammarly announced the deactivation of the implicated feature. The company has also set up an email inbox allowing writers and academics to request exclusion from this feature. Grammarly's CEO acknowledged the mistakes made and apologized, stating that the company would rethink its approach moving forward.

Brief IA — L'actualité IA en français

L'essentiel de l'actualité de l'intelligence artificielle, décrypté et expliqué chaque jour.